1.18.2009

Omniscience and Omnipotence

I wanted to do a few on what I think about scripture, the bible, etc, but if I wanted to be stuck doing that for long blocks of time I would try to write a book (which I would like to do, but I would also like to win the lottery, so you know...). Anyway, I dunno if it was a request to discuss these two loaded words or just a thought about something that we might overlook a lot, but I think those two words are very worth discussing.

Oftentimes in our churches in the twentieth and now twenty-first century we often ascribe to God the qualities of being both omniscient and omnipotent. The problem with that, is that neither word is found in our scriptures. Sure, the basics of the ideas may be there, but not as clearly as many would like us to believe. So again, this is mostly a place for me to think my thoughts through and a place to get some feedback from friends and internet theologians. Feel free to contribute. Or not.

Omniscience: The general idea here is that God knows everything. The typical belief within Christianity, at least in American Christianity as I can't speak for the rest of the world, is that God knows everything including what will happen, what could happen, and what would happen. I think that if we are going to call God "omniscient" we need to nuance that word a little bit. The problem is that we are ascribing to God something that he does not really make clear in the scriptures he has given us.

Let me explain. First of all, I don't think God knows things that are not true. Second I don't think that God knows exactly what a free-agent will do in a general circumstance. Let me put it this way, God does not know the DNA of a unicorn. He cannot know it. There is no such thing, so there is no reason for God to know it. God only knows fact. God does not lie and there is no lie in him. God can know the lie that someone tells, and if someone wrote a book describing the DNA of a unicorn, God could know that too, but that does not mean that God would know the actual DNA of a unicorn, just the speculative one. I dunno if that makes any sense, but it did in my head.

Second, in the same way, I don't think it is possible to know what free creatures will do before they have chosen it. If we are truly free to do either A or B, then I think it would be impossible for God to know. He may know which is more likely, but I don't think he knows beyond a shadow of a doubt. There are some exceptions. I think God does sometimes take away our free will and force us to decide certain things. I think he never does this in the case of salvation, meaning, I think God always allows us to chose our eternal destiny. But I do think if God wants me to go to Arby's tomorrow, God will make me go to Arby's tomorrow. There are tons of places in scripture that seem to indicate that God does not know how a people will choose, when God changes his mind, or God hoped something would happen but it did not. There are other places that seem to disagree. A person must give priority to one or the other, then interpret the one he or she didn't choose in light of the one with priority.

So I think God knows everything that is possible to know, but God does not know those things that are impossible. (Cue the Calvinist argument that I am putting God in a box)

Omnipotence: We also often have a difficult time understanding this word. In principle, I agree that God is omnipotent. God is all-powerful. I think God can do anything he wants to do (so long as it is possible). But that is all too often taken to mean that God is the ultimate micro-manager. God has decreed when I will die, when I will eat next, even when this blog will end. That is not, however, the God that you find in the bible. God allows people to have choice, to do meaningful things, to matter.

So, since this blog is too long as it is, I will stop for today by saying that God could micro-manage in that way, the scripture seems pretty clear that God does not. God is both omnipotent and omniscient, just not in the way all too many people ascribe to him.

4 comments:

Misty said...

Hey Chris. I don't always feel like I have a lot to contribute to these discussions but I do enjoy reading your thoughts and being spurred to think about it all. This post reminded me of the story Roark used to tell about the professor who played chess. Do you know it? It always comes back to me when thinking about these things. (I'm void of the fancy words for it all.)

Chris said...

I think I remember, but I would enjoy to hear you retell it... or read you retell it.

Chris said...

*would enjoy hearing*

Grant said...

Roark's analogy is great, but i think a good complementary analogy is music, because it expresses the linear nature of God's providence. It seems like God's decision making and interaction with the world can be describe as when a composer creates music. Before the songwriter even begins, they know that they are confined to the 12 pitches we see in music. they are also confined probably to the range of a piano's keyboard. As soon as they choose a key, say C major, they have negated the possiblity of any sharps or flats. Each decision the composer makes creates or nullifies particular future decisions. The standard for selecting whatever comes next is harmony. I don't think thats too different from how God does things. Slowly removing relational dissonance from the world? anyways, i think its a cool. chris, I'm onto you.